Revert r88718, which does NOT solve the constructor-template-as-copy-constructor issue. Big thanks to John for finding this

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@88724 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 19 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp
index f059766356..79bf7c585e 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 // RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
 struct X0 { // expected-note{{candidate}}
   X0(int); // expected-note{{candidate}}
   template<typename T> X0(T);
@@ -51,22 +52,3 @@ template<class C> struct A {};
 template <> struct A<int>{A(const A<int>&);};
 struct B { A<int> x; B(B& a) : x(a.x) {} };
 
-struct X2 {
-  X2();
-  X2(X2&);
-  template<typename T> X2(T, int = 17);
-};
-
-X2 test(bool Cond, X2 x2) {
-  if (Cond)
-    return x2; // okay, uses copy constructor
-  
-  return X2(); // expected-error{{incompatible type}}
-}
-
-struct X3 {
-  template<typename T> X3(T);
-};
-
-template<> X3::X3(X3); // expected-error{{no function template matches}}
-