When overload resolution picks an implicitly-deleted special member

function, provide a specialized diagnostic that indicates the kind of
special member function (default constructor, copy assignment
operator, etc.) and that it was implicitly deleted. Add a hook where
we can provide more detailed information later.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp
index 19be03af8f..3b552e2a42 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++11
 
-struct A { //expected-note {{marked deleted here}} \
+struct A { //expected-note {{defined here}} \
      // expected-warning {{does not declare any constructor to initialize}}
      const int i; // expected-note{{const member 'i' will never be initialized}}
      virtual void f() { } 
 };
 
 int main () {
-      (void)A(); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+      (void)A(); // expected-error {{call to implicitly-deleted default constructor}}
 }