<rdar://problem/13267210> Ensure that Sema::CompareReferenceRelationship returns consistent results with invalid types.

When Sema::RequireCompleteType() is given a class template
specialization type that then fails to instantiate, it returns
'true'. On subsequent invocations, it can return false. Make sure that
this difference doesn't change the result of
Sema::CompareReferenceRelationship, which is expected to remain stable
while we're checking an initialization sequence.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@178088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp
index c54956db41..17576328c1 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp
@@ -232,13 +232,15 @@ namespace PR7402 {
 // <rdar://problem/8308215>: don't crash.
 // Lots of questionable recovery here;  errors can change.
 namespace test3 {
-  class A : public std::exception {}; // expected-error {{undeclared identifier}} expected-error {{expected class name}} expected-note 2 {{candidate}}
+  class A : public std::exception {}; // expected-error {{undeclared identifier}} expected-error {{expected class name}} expected-note 4 {{candidate}}
   class B : public A {
   public:
     B(const String& s, int e=0) // expected-error {{unknown type name}} 
       : A(e), m_String(s) , m_ErrorStr(__null) {} // expected-error {{no matching constructor}} expected-error {{does not name}}
     B(const B& e)
-      : A(e), m_String(e.m_String), m_ErrorStr(__null) { // expected-error {{does not name}} expected-error {{no member named 'm_String' in 'test3::B'}}
+      : A(e), m_String(e.m_String), m_ErrorStr(__null) { // expected-error {{does not name}} \
+      // expected-error {{no member named 'm_String' in 'test3::B'}} \
+      // expected-error {{no matching}}
     }
   };
 }