aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnna Zaks <ganna@apple.com>2013-02-09 01:09:27 +0000
committerAnna Zaks <ganna@apple.com>2013-02-09 01:09:27 +0000
commitd523df6a143a97eea46916c6e31c8f2a0728bf28 (patch)
treeeac066a6cd044d1a356978ea683781b9bfcbed59 /lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp
parentadecec39481f925701e63d7fe3b8bf02dd7ddf01 (diff)
[analyzer] Invalidation checker: move the "missing implementation" check
The missing definition check should be in the same category as the missing ivar validation - in this case, the intent is to invalidate in the given class, as described in the declaration, but the implementation does not perform the invalidation. Whereas the MissingInvalidationMethod checker checks the cases where the method intention is not to invalidate. The second checker has potential to have a much higher false positive rate. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@174787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp25
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp
index 6262cb8ef9..0389cc551b 100644
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IvarInvalidationChecker.cpp
@@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ struct ChecksFilter {
DefaultBool check_InstanceVariableInvalidation;
};
-class IvarInvalidationCheckerImpl :
- public Checker<check::ASTDecl<ObjCImplementationDecl> > {
+class IvarInvalidationCheckerImpl {
typedef llvm::SmallSetVector<const ObjCMethodDecl*, 2> MethodSet;
typedef llvm::DenseMap<const ObjCMethodDecl*,
@@ -471,12 +470,20 @@ visit(const ObjCImplementationDecl *ImplD) const {
containsInvalidationMethod(InterfaceD, Info, /*LookForPartial*/ false);
// Report an error in case none of the invalidation methods are declared.
- if (!Info.needsInvalidation() && Filter.check_MissingInvalidationMethod) {
- reportNoInvalidationMethod(FirstIvarDecl, IvarToPopertyMap, InterfaceD,
- /*MissingDeclaration*/ true);
+ if (!Info.needsInvalidation()) {
+ if (Filter.check_MissingInvalidationMethod)
+ reportNoInvalidationMethod(FirstIvarDecl, IvarToPopertyMap, InterfaceD,
+ /*MissingDeclaration*/ true);
+ // If there are no invalidation methods, there is no ivar validation work
+ // to be done.
return;
}
+ // Only check if Ivars are invalidated when InstanceVariableInvalidation
+ // has been requested.
+ if (!Filter.check_InstanceVariableInvalidation)
+ return;
+
// Check that all ivars are invalidated by the invalidation methods.
bool AtImplementationContainsAtLeastOneInvalidationMethod = false;
for (MethodSet::iterator I = Info.InvalidationMethods.begin(),
@@ -489,11 +496,6 @@ visit(const ObjCImplementationDecl *ImplD) const {
if (D && D->hasBody()) {
AtImplementationContainsAtLeastOneInvalidationMethod = true;
- // Only check if Ivars are invalidated when InstanceVariableInvalidation
- // has been requested.
- if (!Filter.check_InstanceVariableInvalidation)
- break;
-
// Get a copy of ivars needing invalidation.
IvarSet IvarsI = Ivars;
@@ -517,8 +519,7 @@ visit(const ObjCImplementationDecl *ImplD) const {
}
// Report an error in case none of the invalidation methods are implemented.
- if (!AtImplementationContainsAtLeastOneInvalidationMethod &&
- Filter.check_MissingInvalidationMethod)
+ if (!AtImplementationContainsAtLeastOneInvalidationMethod)
reportNoInvalidationMethod(FirstIvarDecl, IvarToPopertyMap, InterfaceD,
/*MissingDeclaration*/ false);
}