aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2012-02-04 05:35:53 +0000
committerRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2012-02-04 05:35:53 +0000
commit0b458fd8b6321c11e8b22727e0e9b9960e93ff4d (patch)
tree04a6de94b2327453bec60c637ee23aa9a8c2345e /lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
parent5b66405c4db92ad3ad37c13454960ebfb807418b (diff)
Fix a rejects-valid in C++11: array new of a negative size, or overflowing array
new, is well-formed with defined semantics of throwing (a type which can be caught by a handler for) std::bad_array_new_length, unlike in C++98 where it is somewhere nebulous between undefined behavior and ill-formed. If the array size is an integral constant expression and satisfies one of these criteria, we would previous the array new expression, but now in C++11 mode, we merely issue a warning (the code is still rejected in C++98 mode, naturally). We don't yet implement new C++11 semantics correctly (see PR11644), but we do implement the overflow checking, and (for the default operator new) convert such expressions to an exception, so accepting such code now does not seem especially unsafe. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp48
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 793b70789a..a0fb6e44d9 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -1018,28 +1018,44 @@ Sema::BuildCXXNew(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool UseGlobal,
if (!SizeType->isIntegralOrUnscopedEnumerationType())
return ExprError();
- // Let's see if this is a constant < 0. If so, we reject it out of hand.
- // We don't care about special rules, so we tell the machinery it's not
- // evaluated - it gives us a result in more cases.
+ // C++98 [expr.new]p7:
+ // The expression in a direct-new-declarator shall have integral type
+ // with a non-negative value.
+ //
+ // Let's see if this is a constant < 0. If so, we reject it out of
+ // hand. Otherwise, if it's not a constant, we must have an unparenthesized
+ // array type.
+ //
+ // Note: such a construct has well-defined semantics in C++11: it throws
+ // std::bad_array_new_length.
if (!ArraySize->isValueDependent()) {
llvm::APSInt Value;
- if (ArraySize->isIntegerConstantExpr(Value, Context, 0, false)) {
+ if (ArraySize->isIntegerConstantExpr(Value, Context)) {
if (Value < llvm::APSInt(
llvm::APInt::getNullValue(Value.getBitWidth()),
- Value.isUnsigned()))
- return ExprError(Diag(ArraySize->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
- diag::err_typecheck_negative_array_size)
- << ArraySize->getSourceRange());
-
- if (!AllocType->isDependentType()) {
- unsigned ActiveSizeBits
- = ConstantArrayType::getNumAddressingBits(Context, AllocType, Value);
- if (ActiveSizeBits > ConstantArrayType::getMaxSizeBits(Context)) {
+ Value.isUnsigned())) {
+ if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x)
Diag(ArraySize->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
- diag::err_array_too_large)
- << Value.toString(10)
+ diag::warn_typecheck_negative_array_new_size)
<< ArraySize->getSourceRange();
- return ExprError();
+ else
+ return ExprError(Diag(ArraySize->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::err_typecheck_negative_array_size)
+ << ArraySize->getSourceRange());
+ } else if (!AllocType->isDependentType()) {
+ unsigned ActiveSizeBits =
+ ConstantArrayType::getNumAddressingBits(Context, AllocType, Value);
+ if (ActiveSizeBits > ConstantArrayType::getMaxSizeBits(Context)) {
+ if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x)
+ Diag(ArraySize->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::warn_array_new_too_large)
+ << Value.toString(10)
+ << ArraySize->getSourceRange();
+ else
+ return ExprError(Diag(ArraySize->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::err_array_too_large)
+ << Value.toString(10)
+ << ArraySize->getSourceRange());
}
}
} else if (TypeIdParens.isValid()) {