Add basic, hackish support for instantiation of typedefs in a class

template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?




git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
index 9a86d65f9a..95c0baae56 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -4344,6 +4344,8 @@ Sema::ExprResult Sema::ActOnBuiltinOffsetOf(Scope *S,
   if (!Dependent && !ArgTy->isRecordType())
     return Diag(TypeLoc, diag::err_offsetof_record_type) << ArgTy;
 
+  // FIXME: Does the type need to be complete?
+
   // Otherwise, create a null pointer as the base, and iteratively process
   // the offsetof designators.
   QualType ArgTyPtr = Context.getPointerType(ArgTy);