PR15300: Support C++11 attributes on base-specifiers. We don't support any such

attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@175575 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 1711c8726e..8b0ccd7146 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -1172,6 +1172,7 @@ Sema::CheckBaseSpecifier(CXXRecordDecl *Class,
 /// 'public bar' and 'virtual private baz' are each base-specifiers.
 BaseResult
 Sema::ActOnBaseSpecifier(Decl *classdecl, SourceRange SpecifierRange,
+                         ParsedAttributes &Attributes,
                          bool Virtual, AccessSpecifier Access,
                          ParsedType basetype, SourceLocation BaseLoc,
                          SourceLocation EllipsisLoc) {
@@ -1183,6 +1184,22 @@ Sema::ActOnBaseSpecifier(Decl *classdecl, SourceRange SpecifierRange,
   if (!Class)
     return true;
 
+  // We do not support any C++11 attributes on base-specifiers yet.
+  // Diagnose any attributes we see.
+  if (!Attributes.empty()) {
+    for (AttributeList *Attr = Attributes.getList(); Attr;
+         Attr = Attr->getNext()) {
+      if (Attr->isInvalid() ||
+          Attr->getKind() == AttributeList::IgnoredAttribute)
+        continue;
+      Diag(Attr->getLoc(),
+           Attr->getKind() == AttributeList::UnknownAttribute
+             ? diag::warn_unknown_attribute_ignored
+             : diag::err_base_specifier_attribute)
+        << Attr->getName();
+    }
+  }
+
   TypeSourceInfo *TInfo = 0;
   GetTypeFromParser(basetype, &TInfo);