diff options
author | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2011-02-20 03:19:35 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2011-02-20 03:19:35 +0000 |
commit | 34b41d939a1328f484511c6002ba2456db879a29 (patch) | |
tree | 9631c2ce7dde0b9c680fe463d5718d0cb8f92e45 /lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | |
parent | 9ed9a250180f19b2c44df83a196fc3a2ac82f817 (diff) |
Implement the C++0x deduced 'auto' feature.
This fixes PR 8738, 9060 and 9132.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@126069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 178 |
1 files changed, 133 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index 679b430a3c..dd30c1261e 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -1471,48 +1471,26 @@ bool Sema::MergeCompatibleFunctionDecls(FunctionDecl *New, FunctionDecl *Old) { return false; } -/// MergeVarDecl - We just parsed a variable 'New' which has the same name -/// and scope as a previous declaration 'Old'. Figure out how to resolve this -/// situation, merging decls or emitting diagnostics as appropriate. +/// MergeVarDecl - We parsed a variable 'New' which has the same name and scope +/// as a previous declaration 'Old'. Figure out how to merge their types, +/// emitting diagnostics as appropriate. /// -/// Tentative definition rules (C99 6.9.2p2) are checked by -/// FinalizeDeclaratorGroup. Unfortunately, we can't analyze tentative -/// definitions here, since the initializer hasn't been attached. +/// Declarations using the auto type specifier (C++ [decl.spec.auto]) call back +/// to here in AddInitializerToDecl and AddCXXDirectInitializerToDecl. We can't +/// check them before the initializer is attached. /// -void Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, LookupResult &Previous) { - // If the new decl is already invalid, don't do any other checking. - if (New->isInvalidDecl()) +void Sema::MergeVarDeclTypes(VarDecl *New, VarDecl *Old) { + if (New->isInvalidDecl() || Old->isInvalidDecl()) return; - // Verify the old decl was also a variable. - VarDecl *Old = 0; - if (!Previous.isSingleResult() || - !(Old = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(Previous.getFoundDecl()))) { - Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::err_redefinition_different_kind) - << New->getDeclName(); - Diag(Previous.getRepresentativeDecl()->getLocation(), - diag::note_previous_definition); - return New->setInvalidDecl(); - } - - // C++ [class.mem]p1: - // A member shall not be declared twice in the member-specification [...] - // - // Here, we need only consider static data members. - if (Old->isStaticDataMember() && !New->isOutOfLine()) { - Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::err_duplicate_member) - << New->getIdentifier(); - Diag(Old->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_declaration); - New->setInvalidDecl(); - } - - MergeDeclAttributes(New, Old, Context); - - // Merge the types QualType MergedT; if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) { - if (Context.hasSameType(New->getType(), Old->getType())) - MergedT = New->getType(); + AutoType *AT = New->getType()->getContainedAutoType(); + if (AT && !AT->isDeduced()) { + // We don't know what the new type is until the initializer is attached. + return; + } else if (Context.hasSameType(New->getType(), Old->getType())) + return; // C++ [basic.link]p10: // [...] the types specified by all declarations referring to a given // object or function shall be identical, except that declarations for an @@ -1536,7 +1514,8 @@ void Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, LookupResult &Previous) { MergedT = Old->getType(); } else if (New->getType()->isObjCObjectPointerType() && Old->getType()->isObjCObjectPointerType()) { - MergedT = Context.mergeObjCGCQualifiers(New->getType(), Old->getType()); + MergedT = Context.mergeObjCGCQualifiers(New->getType(), + Old->getType()); } } else { MergedT = Context.mergeTypes(New->getType(), Old->getType()); @@ -1548,6 +1527,49 @@ void Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, LookupResult &Previous) { return New->setInvalidDecl(); } New->setType(MergedT); +} + +/// MergeVarDecl - We just parsed a variable 'New' which has the same name +/// and scope as a previous declaration 'Old'. Figure out how to resolve this +/// situation, merging decls or emitting diagnostics as appropriate. +/// +/// Tentative definition rules (C99 6.9.2p2) are checked by +/// FinalizeDeclaratorGroup. Unfortunately, we can't analyze tentative +/// definitions here, since the initializer hasn't been attached. +/// +void Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, LookupResult &Previous) { + // If the new decl is already invalid, don't do any other checking. + if (New->isInvalidDecl()) + return; + + // Verify the old decl was also a variable. + VarDecl *Old = 0; + if (!Previous.isSingleResult() || + !(Old = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(Previous.getFoundDecl()))) { + Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::err_redefinition_different_kind) + << New->getDeclName(); + Diag(Previous.getRepresentativeDecl()->getLocation(), + diag::note_previous_definition); + return New->setInvalidDecl(); + } + + // C++ [class.mem]p1: + // A member shall not be declared twice in the member-specification [...] + // + // Here, we need only consider static data members. + if (Old->isStaticDataMember() && !New->isOutOfLine()) { + Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::err_duplicate_member) + << New->getIdentifier(); + Diag(Old->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_declaration); + New->setInvalidDecl(); + } + + MergeDeclAttributes(New, Old, Context); + + // Merge the types. + MergeVarDeclTypes(New, Old); + if (New->isInvalidDecl()) + return; // C99 6.2.2p4: Check if we have a static decl followed by a non-static. if (New->getStorageClass() == SC_Static && @@ -3004,6 +3026,12 @@ Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator(Scope *S, Declarator &D, DeclContext *DC, NewVD = VarDecl::Create(Context, DC, D.getIdentifierLoc(), II, R, TInfo, SC, SCAsWritten); + // If this decl has an auto type in need of deduction, mark the VarDecl so + // we can diagnose uses of it in its own initializer. + if (D.getDeclSpec().getTypeSpecType() == DeclSpec::TST_auto) { + NewVD->setParsingAutoInit(R->getContainedAutoType()); + } + if (D.isInvalidType() || Invalid) NewVD->setInvalidDecl(); @@ -4466,17 +4494,14 @@ bool Sema::CheckForConstantInitializer(Expr *Init, QualType DclT) { return true; } -void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *dcl, Expr *init) { - AddInitializerToDecl(dcl, init, /*DirectInit=*/false); -} - /// AddInitializerToDecl - Adds the initializer Init to the /// declaration dcl. If DirectInit is true, this is C++ direct /// initialization rather than copy initialization. -void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, bool DirectInit) { +void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, + bool DirectInit, bool TypeMayContainAuto) { // If there is no declaration, there was an error parsing it. Just ignore // the initializer. - if (RealDecl == 0) + if (RealDecl == 0 || RealDecl->isInvalidDecl()) return; if (CXXMethodDecl *Method = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(RealDecl)) { @@ -4507,6 +4532,25 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, bool DirectInit) { return; } + // C++0x [decl.spec.auto]p6. Deduce the type which 'auto' stands in for. + if (TypeMayContainAuto && VDecl->getType()->getContainedAutoType()) { + VDecl->setParsingAutoInit(false); + + QualType DeducedType; + if (!DeduceAutoType(VDecl->getType(), Init, DeducedType)) { + Diag(VDecl->getLocation(), diag::err_auto_var_deduction_failure) + << VDecl->getDeclName() << VDecl->getType() << Init->getType() + << Init->getSourceRange(); + RealDecl->setInvalidDecl(); + return; + } + VDecl->setType(DeducedType); + + // If this is a redeclaration, check that the type we just deduced matches + // the previously declared type. + if (VarDecl *Old = VDecl->getPreviousDeclaration()) + MergeVarDeclTypes(VDecl, Old); + } // A definition must end up with a complete type, which means it must be @@ -4755,6 +4799,13 @@ void Sema::ActOnInitializerError(Decl *D) { VarDecl *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D); if (!VD) return; + // Auto types are meaningless if we can't make sense of the initializer. + if (VD->isParsingAutoInit()) { + VD->setParsingAutoInit(false); + VD->setInvalidDecl(); + return; + } + QualType Ty = VD->getType(); if (Ty->isDependentType()) return; @@ -4779,7 +4830,7 @@ void Sema::ActOnInitializerError(Decl *D) { } void Sema::ActOnUninitializedDecl(Decl *RealDecl, - bool TypeContainsUndeducedAuto) { + bool TypeMayContainAuto) { // If there is no declaration, there was an error parsing it. Just ignore it. if (RealDecl == 0) return; @@ -4788,7 +4839,9 @@ void Sema::ActOnUninitializedDecl(Decl *RealDecl, QualType Type = Var->getType(); // C++0x [dcl.spec.auto]p3 - if (TypeContainsUndeducedAuto) { + if (TypeMayContainAuto && Type->getContainedAutoType()) { + Var->setParsingAutoInit(false); + Diag(Var->getLocation(), diag::err_auto_var_requires_init) << Var->getDeclName() << Type; Var->setInvalidDecl(); @@ -4999,6 +5052,41 @@ Sema::FinalizeDeclaratorGroup(Scope *S, const DeclSpec &DS, if (DS.isTypeSpecOwned()) Decls.push_back(DS.getRepAsDecl()); + // C++0x [dcl.spec.auto]p7: + // If the type deduced for the template parameter U is not the same in each + // deduction, the program is ill-formed. + // FIXME: When initializer-list support is added, a distinction is needed + // between the deduced type U and the deduced type which 'auto' stands for. + // auto a = 0, b = { 1, 2, 3 }; + // is legal because the deduced type U is 'int' in both cases. + bool TypeContainsAuto = DS.getTypeSpecType() == DeclSpec::TST_auto; + if (TypeContainsAuto && NumDecls > 1) { + QualType Deduced; + CanQualType DeducedCanon; + VarDecl *DeducedDecl = 0; + for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumDecls; ++i) { + if (VarDecl *D = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(Group[i])) { + AutoType *AT = D->getType()->getContainedAutoType(); + if (AT && AT->isDeduced()) { + QualType U = AT->getDeducedType(); + CanQualType UCanon = Context.getCanonicalType(U); + if (Deduced.isNull()) { + Deduced = U; + DeducedCanon = UCanon; + DeducedDecl = D; + } else if (DeducedCanon != UCanon) { + Diag(DS.getTypeSpecTypeLoc(), diag::err_auto_different_deductions) + << Deduced << DeducedDecl->getDeclName() + << U << D->getDeclName() + << DeducedDecl->getInit()->getSourceRange() + << D->getInit()->getSourceRange(); + break; + } + } + } + } + } + for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumDecls; ++i) if (Decl *D = Group[i]) Decls.push_back(D); |