diff options
author | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2013-01-17 22:06:26 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2013-01-17 22:06:26 +0000 |
commit | 995e4a7530d705147c875b63608532c483c011a8 (patch) | |
tree | ead70b7875eea8777ff0ab9114a832e13cd9b770 /lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp | |
parent | 0234179282d59e6dfccc8b2da72a9a71bf5b6ac3 (diff) |
-Wunsequenced: if the LHS of an &&, || or ?: is not constant, check for
unsequenced operations in the RHS. We don't compare the RHS with the rest of
the expression yet; such checks will need care to avoid diagnosing unsequenced
operations which are both in conditionally-evaluated subexpressions which
actually can't occur together, such as in '(b && ++x) + (!b && ++x)'.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@172760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp | 28 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp index 69500ae87c..1b9239c6e9 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp @@ -5507,9 +5507,18 @@ public: bool Result; if (!BO->getLHS()->isValueDependent() && - BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context) && - !Result) - Visit(BO->getRHS()); + BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context)) { + if (!Result) + Visit(BO->getRHS()); + } else { + // Check for unsequenced operations in the RHS, treating it as an + // entirely separate evaluation. + // + // FIXME: If there are operations in the RHS which are unsequenced + // with respect to operations outside the RHS, and those operations + // are unconditionally evaluated, diagnose them. + SequenceChecker(SemaRef, BO->getRHS()); + } } void VisitBinLAnd(BinaryOperator *BO) { { @@ -5519,9 +5528,12 @@ public: bool Result; if (!BO->getLHS()->isValueDependent() && - BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context) && - Result) - Visit(BO->getRHS()); + BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context)) { + if (Result) + Visit(BO->getRHS()); + } else { + SequenceChecker(SemaRef, BO->getRHS()); + } } // Only visit the condition, unless we can be sure which subexpression will @@ -5534,6 +5546,10 @@ public: if (!CO->getCond()->isValueDependent() && CO->getCond()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context)) Visit(Result ? CO->getTrueExpr() : CO->getFalseExpr()); + else { + SequenceChecker(SemaRef, CO->getTrueExpr()); + SequenceChecker(SemaRef, CO->getFalseExpr()); + } } void VisitCXXConstructExpr(CXXConstructExpr *CCE) { |