aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-03-27 23:10:48 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-03-27 23:10:48 +0000
commitd57959af02b4af695276f4204443afe6e5d86bd8 (patch)
tree1c3cfaf8db2cb260e9365d44d7f5b178a836b750 /lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
parentced21016cec1f189a695857bed103ecc9e3f3696 (diff)
Initial implementation of parsing, semantic analysis, and template
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as typename T::type The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the simple-template-id form, e.g., typename T::template apply<U, V> Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this point we don't have any representation of a class template specialization whose template-name is unknown. Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for template instantiation that works for simple examples. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
index 8fb2811ce5..a879989b33 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
@@ -127,17 +127,20 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
if (TypeDecl *Type = dyn_cast<TypeDecl>(SD)) {
// Determine whether we have a class (or, in C++0x, an enum) or
// a typedef thereof. If so, build the nested-name-specifier.
- QualType T;
- if (TypedefDecl *TD = dyn_cast<TypedefDecl>(SD)) {
+ QualType T = Context.getTypeDeclType(Type);
+ bool AcceptableType = false;
+ if (T->isDependentType())
+ AcceptableType = true;
+ else if (TypedefDecl *TD = dyn_cast<TypedefDecl>(SD)) {
if (TD->getUnderlyingType()->isRecordType() ||
(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x &&
TD->getUnderlyingType()->isEnumeralType()))
- T = Context.getTypeDeclType(TD);
+ AcceptableType = true;
} else if (isa<RecordDecl>(Type) ||
(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x && isa<EnumDecl>(Type)))
- T = Context.getTypeDeclType(Type);
+ AcceptableType = true;
- if (!T.isNull())
+ if (AcceptableType)
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, false,
T.getTypePtr());
}