diff options
| author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2012-05-01 20:23:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2012-05-01 20:23:02 +0000 |
| commit | 05e6076f0a02dbb73d20a3928976bcd242a13279 (patch) | |
| tree | 3ccc70ec3695c7ccc39ba11513e22892ecfaead6 /lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp | |
| parent | d53f6971a7c97c9a564c9a7b3b1dd773d120aac8 (diff) | |
In C++11 mode, implement the C++11 semantics for
[basic.lookup.classref]p1 and p4, which concerns name lookup for
nested-name-specifiers and template names, respectively, in a member
access expression. C++98/03 forces us to look both in the scope of the
object and in the current scope, then compare the results. C++11 just
takes the result from the scope of the object, if something is
found. Fixes <rdar://problem/11328502>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@155935 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp | 7 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp index 5a0fceca20..3a884a95a1 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp @@ -539,8 +539,9 @@ bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, NamedDecl *SD = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>(); if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD)) { - if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) { - // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4: + if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope && + !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus0x) { + // C++03 [basic.lookup.classref]p4: // [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the // class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity. // @@ -548,6 +549,8 @@ bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, // into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to // see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no // scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself. + // + // Note that C++11 does *not* perform this redundant lookup. NamedDecl *OuterDecl; if (S) { LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, |