libstdc++ 4.4 uses __is_signed as an identifier, while Clang treats it

as a keyword for the __is_signed type trait. Cope with this conflict
via some hackish recovery: if we see a declaration of the form

 static const bool __is_signed

then we stop treating __is_signed as a keyword and instead treat it as
an identifier. It's ugly, but it's better than making the __is_signed
type trait conditional on some language flag. Fixes PR9804.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@130399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
index 24a487c89c..a20e90bd0e 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
@@ -1479,6 +1479,24 @@ void Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers(DeclSpec &DS,
       continue;
     }
 
+    case tok::kw___is_signed:
+      // GNU libstdc++ 4.4 uses __is_signed as an identifier, but Clang
+      // typically treats it as a trait. If we see __is_signed as it appears
+      // in libstdc++, e.g.,
+      //
+      //   static const bool __is_signed;
+      //
+      // then treat __is_signed as an identifier rather than as a keyword.
+      if (DS.getTypeSpecType() == TST_bool &&
+          DS.getTypeQualifiers() == DeclSpec::TQ_const &&
+          DS.getStorageClassSpec() == DeclSpec::SCS_static) {
+        Tok.getIdentifierInfo()->RevertTokenIDToIdentifier();
+        Tok.setKind(tok::identifier);
+      }
+
+      // We're done with the declaration-specifiers.
+      goto DoneWithDeclSpec;
+        
       // typedef-name
     case tok::identifier: {
       // In C++, check to see if this is a scope specifier like foo::bar::, if