aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>2008-03-15 23:59:48 +0000
committerChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>2008-03-15 23:59:48 +0000
commitbda0b626e74513950405c27525af87e214e605e2 (patch)
tree60149b18fd68ccc1281c62fe4387b5a1da39a5fa /lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp
parentfbdeba1c530dc3534a6f5b788e43d1a43c260128 (diff)
Make a major restructuring of the clang tree: introduce a top-level
lib dir and move all the libraries into it. This follows the main llvm tree, and allows the libraries to be built in parallel. The top level now enforces that all the libs are built before Driver, but we don't care what order the libs are built in. This speeds up parallel builds, particularly incremental ones. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@48402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp639
1 files changed, 639 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp b/lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cca7628917
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,639 @@
+//===--- PPExpressions.cpp - Preprocessor Expression Evaluation -----------===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file implements the Preprocessor::EvaluateDirectiveExpression method,
+// which parses and evaluates integer constant expressions for #if directives.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// FIXME: implement testing for #assert's.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/MacroInfo.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/LiteralSupport.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/TokenKinds.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/APSInt.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h"
+using namespace clang;
+
+static bool EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr(llvm::APSInt &LHS, unsigned MinPrec,
+ Token &PeekTok, bool ValueLive,
+ Preprocessor &PP);
+
+/// DefinedTracker - This struct is used while parsing expressions to keep track
+/// of whether !defined(X) has been seen.
+///
+/// With this simple scheme, we handle the basic forms:
+/// !defined(X) and !defined X
+/// but we also trivially handle (silly) stuff like:
+/// !!!defined(X) and +!defined(X) and !+!+!defined(X) and !(defined(X)).
+struct DefinedTracker {
+ /// Each time a Value is evaluated, it returns information about whether the
+ /// parsed value is of the form defined(X), !defined(X) or is something else.
+ enum TrackerState {
+ DefinedMacro, // defined(X)
+ NotDefinedMacro, // !defined(X)
+ Unknown // Something else.
+ } State;
+ /// TheMacro - When the state is DefinedMacro or NotDefinedMacro, this
+ /// indicates the macro that was checked.
+ IdentifierInfo *TheMacro;
+};
+
+
+
+/// EvaluateValue - Evaluate the token PeekTok (and any others needed) and
+/// return the computed value in Result. Return true if there was an error
+/// parsing. This function also returns information about the form of the
+/// expression in DT. See above for information on what DT means.
+///
+/// If ValueLive is false, then this value is being evaluated in a context where
+/// the result is not used. As such, avoid diagnostics that relate to
+/// evaluation.
+static bool EvaluateValue(llvm::APSInt &Result, Token &PeekTok,
+ DefinedTracker &DT, bool ValueLive,
+ Preprocessor &PP) {
+ Result = 0;
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::Unknown;
+
+ // If this token's spelling is a pp-identifier, check to see if it is
+ // 'defined' or if it is a macro. Note that we check here because many
+ // keywords are pp-identifiers, so we can't check the kind.
+ if (IdentifierInfo *II = PeekTok.getIdentifierInfo()) {
+ // If this identifier isn't 'defined' and it wasn't macro expanded, it turns
+ // into a simple 0, unless it is the C++ keyword "true", in which case it
+ // turns into "1".
+ if (II->getPPKeywordID() != tok::pp_defined) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::warn_pp_undef_identifier, II->getName());
+ Result = II->getTokenID() == tok::kw_true;
+ Result.setIsUnsigned(false); // "0" is signed intmax_t 0.
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // Handle "defined X" and "defined(X)".
+
+ // Get the next token, don't expand it.
+ PP.LexUnexpandedToken(PeekTok);
+
+ // Two options, it can either be a pp-identifier or a (.
+ bool InParens = false;
+ if (PeekTok.is(tok::l_paren)) {
+ // Found a paren, remember we saw it and skip it.
+ InParens = true;
+ PP.LexUnexpandedToken(PeekTok);
+ }
+
+ // If we don't have a pp-identifier now, this is an error.
+ if ((II = PeekTok.getIdentifierInfo()) == 0) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_defined_requires_identifier);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ // Otherwise, we got an identifier, is it defined to something?
+ Result = II->hasMacroDefinition();
+ Result.setIsUnsigned(false); // Result is signed intmax_t.
+
+ // If there is a macro, mark it used.
+ if (Result != 0 && ValueLive) {
+ MacroInfo *Macro = PP.getMacroInfo(II);
+ Macro->setIsUsed(true);
+ }
+
+ // Consume identifier.
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+
+ // If we are in parens, ensure we have a trailing ).
+ if (InParens) {
+ if (PeekTok.isNot(tok::r_paren)) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_missing_rparen);
+ return true;
+ }
+ // Consume the ).
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ }
+
+ // Success, remember that we saw defined(X).
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::DefinedMacro;
+ DT.TheMacro = II;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ switch (PeekTok.getKind()) {
+ default: // Non-value token.
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_expr_bad_token);
+ return true;
+ case tok::eom:
+ case tok::r_paren:
+ // If there is no expression, report and exit.
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_expected_value_in_expr);
+ return true;
+ case tok::numeric_constant: {
+ llvm::SmallString<64> IntegerBuffer;
+ IntegerBuffer.resize(PeekTok.getLength());
+ const char *ThisTokBegin = &IntegerBuffer[0];
+ unsigned ActualLength = PP.getSpelling(PeekTok, ThisTokBegin);
+ NumericLiteralParser Literal(ThisTokBegin, ThisTokBegin+ActualLength,
+ PeekTok.getLocation(), PP);
+ if (Literal.hadError)
+ return true; // a diagnostic was already reported.
+
+ if (Literal.isFloatingLiteral() || Literal.isImaginary) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_illegal_floating_literal);
+ return true;
+ }
+ assert(Literal.isIntegerLiteral() && "Unknown ppnumber");
+
+ // long long is a C99 feature.
+ if (!PP.getLangOptions().C99 && !PP.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x
+ && Literal.isLongLong)
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::ext_longlong);
+
+ // Parse the integer literal into Result.
+ if (Literal.GetIntegerValue(Result)) {
+ // Overflow parsing integer literal.
+ if (ValueLive) PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::warn_integer_too_large);
+ Result.setIsUnsigned(true);
+ } else {
+ // Set the signedness of the result to match whether there was a U suffix
+ // or not.
+ Result.setIsUnsigned(Literal.isUnsigned);
+
+ // Detect overflow based on whether the value is signed. If signed
+ // and if the value is too large, emit a warning "integer constant is so
+ // large that it is unsigned" e.g. on 12345678901234567890 where intmax_t
+ // is 64-bits.
+ if (!Literal.isUnsigned && Result.isNegative()) {
+ if (ValueLive)PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::warn_integer_too_large_for_signed);
+ Result.setIsUnsigned(true);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Consume the token.
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ return false;
+ }
+ case tok::char_constant: { // 'x'
+ llvm::SmallString<32> CharBuffer;
+ CharBuffer.resize(PeekTok.getLength());
+ const char *ThisTokBegin = &CharBuffer[0];
+ unsigned ActualLength = PP.getSpelling(PeekTok, ThisTokBegin);
+ CharLiteralParser Literal(ThisTokBegin, ThisTokBegin+ActualLength,
+ PeekTok.getLocation(), PP);
+ if (Literal.hadError())
+ return true; // A diagnostic was already emitted.
+
+ // Character literals are always int or wchar_t, expand to intmax_t.
+ TargetInfo &TI = PP.getTargetInfo();
+ unsigned NumBits = TI.getCharWidth(Literal.isWide());
+
+ // Set the width.
+ llvm::APSInt Val(NumBits);
+ // Set the value.
+ Val = Literal.getValue();
+ // Set the signedness.
+ Val.setIsUnsigned(!TI.isCharSigned());
+
+ if (Result.getBitWidth() > Val.getBitWidth()) {
+ Result = Val.extend(Result.getBitWidth());
+ } else {
+ assert(Result.getBitWidth() == Val.getBitWidth() &&
+ "intmax_t smaller than char/wchar_t?");
+ Result = Val;
+ }
+
+ // Consume the token.
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ return false;
+ }
+ case tok::l_paren:
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok); // Eat the (.
+ // Parse the value and if there are any binary operators involved, parse
+ // them.
+ if (EvaluateValue(Result, PeekTok, DT, ValueLive, PP)) return true;
+
+ // If this is a silly value like (X), which doesn't need parens, check for
+ // !(defined X).
+ if (PeekTok.is(tok::r_paren)) {
+ // Just use DT unmodified as our result.
+ } else {
+ if (EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr(Result, 1, PeekTok, ValueLive, PP))
+ return true;
+
+ if (PeekTok.isNot(tok::r_paren)) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_expected_rparen);
+ return true;
+ }
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::Unknown;
+ }
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok); // Eat the ).
+ return false;
+
+ case tok::plus:
+ // Unary plus doesn't modify the value.
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ return EvaluateValue(Result, PeekTok, DT, ValueLive, PP);
+ case tok::minus: {
+ SourceLocation Loc = PeekTok.getLocation();
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ if (EvaluateValue(Result, PeekTok, DT, ValueLive, PP)) return true;
+ // C99 6.5.3.3p3: The sign of the result matches the sign of the operand.
+ Result = -Result;
+
+ bool Overflow = false;
+ if (Result.isUnsigned())
+ Overflow = Result.isNegative();
+ else if (Result.isMinSignedValue())
+ Overflow = true; // -MININT is the only thing that overflows.
+
+ // If this operator is live and overflowed, report the issue.
+ if (Overflow && ValueLive)
+ PP.Diag(Loc, diag::warn_pp_expr_overflow);
+
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::Unknown;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ case tok::tilde:
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ if (EvaluateValue(Result, PeekTok, DT, ValueLive, PP)) return true;
+ // C99 6.5.3.3p4: The sign of the result matches the sign of the operand.
+ Result = ~Result;
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::Unknown;
+ return false;
+
+ case tok::exclaim:
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+ if (EvaluateValue(Result, PeekTok, DT, ValueLive, PP)) return true;
+ Result = !Result;
+ // C99 6.5.3.3p5: The sign of the result is 'int', aka it is signed.
+ Result.setIsUnsigned(false);
+
+ if (DT.State == DefinedTracker::DefinedMacro)
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::NotDefinedMacro;
+ else if (DT.State == DefinedTracker::NotDefinedMacro)
+ DT.State = DefinedTracker::DefinedMacro;
+ return false;
+
+ // FIXME: Handle #assert
+ }
+}
+
+
+
+/// getPrecedence - Return the precedence of the specified binary operator
+/// token. This returns:
+/// ~0 - Invalid token.
+/// 14 - *,/,%
+/// 13 - -,+
+/// 12 - <<,>>
+/// 11 - >=, <=, >, <
+/// 10 - ==, !=
+/// 9 - &
+/// 8 - ^
+/// 7 - |
+/// 6 - &&
+/// 5 - ||
+/// 4 - ?
+/// 3 - :
+/// 0 - eom, )
+static unsigned getPrecedence(tok::TokenKind Kind) {
+ switch (Kind) {
+ default: return ~0U;
+ case tok::percent:
+ case tok::slash:
+ case tok::star: return 14;
+ case tok::plus:
+ case tok::minus: return 13;
+ case tok::lessless:
+ case tok::greatergreater: return 12;
+ case tok::lessequal:
+ case tok::less:
+ case tok::greaterequal:
+ case tok::greater: return 11;
+ case tok::exclaimequal:
+ case tok::equalequal: return 10;
+ case tok::amp: return 9;
+ case tok::caret: return 8;
+ case tok::pipe: return 7;
+ case tok::ampamp: return 6;
+ case tok::pipepipe: return 5;
+ case tok::question: return 4;
+ case tok::colon: return 3;
+ case tok::comma: return 2;
+ case tok::r_paren: return 0; // Lowest priority, end of expr.
+ case tok::eom: return 0; // Lowest priority, end of macro.
+ }
+}
+
+
+/// EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr - Evaluate the subexpression whose first token is
+/// PeekTok, and whose precedence is PeekPrec.
+///
+/// If ValueLive is false, then this value is being evaluated in a context where
+/// the result is not used. As such, avoid diagnostics that relate to
+/// evaluation.
+static bool EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr(llvm::APSInt &LHS, unsigned MinPrec,
+ Token &PeekTok, bool ValueLive,
+ Preprocessor &PP) {
+ unsigned PeekPrec = getPrecedence(PeekTok.getKind());
+ // If this token isn't valid, report the error.
+ if (PeekPrec == ~0U) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_expr_bad_token);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ while (1) {
+ // If this token has a lower precedence than we are allowed to parse, return
+ // it so that higher levels of the recursion can parse it.
+ if (PeekPrec < MinPrec)
+ return false;
+
+ tok::TokenKind Operator = PeekTok.getKind();
+
+ // If this is a short-circuiting operator, see if the RHS of the operator is
+ // dead. Note that this cannot just clobber ValueLive. Consider
+ // "0 && 1 ? 4 : 1 / 0", which is parsed as "(0 && 1) ? 4 : (1 / 0)". In
+ // this example, the RHS of the && being dead does not make the rest of the
+ // expr dead.
+ bool RHSIsLive;
+ if (Operator == tok::ampamp && LHS == 0)
+ RHSIsLive = false; // RHS of "0 && x" is dead.
+ else if (Operator == tok::pipepipe && LHS != 0)
+ RHSIsLive = false; // RHS of "1 || x" is dead.
+ else if (Operator == tok::question && LHS == 0)
+ RHSIsLive = false; // RHS (x) of "0 ? x : y" is dead.
+ else
+ RHSIsLive = ValueLive;
+
+ // Consume the operator, saving the operator token for error reporting.
+ Token OpToken = PeekTok;
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+
+ llvm::APSInt RHS(LHS.getBitWidth());
+ // Parse the RHS of the operator.
+ DefinedTracker DT;
+ if (EvaluateValue(RHS, PeekTok, DT, RHSIsLive, PP)) return true;
+
+ // Remember the precedence of this operator and get the precedence of the
+ // operator immediately to the right of the RHS.
+ unsigned ThisPrec = PeekPrec;
+ PeekPrec = getPrecedence(PeekTok.getKind());
+
+ // If this token isn't valid, report the error.
+ if (PeekPrec == ~0U) {
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::err_pp_expr_bad_token);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ bool isRightAssoc = Operator == tok::question;
+
+ // Get the precedence of the operator to the right of the RHS. If it binds
+ // more tightly with RHS than we do, evaluate it completely first.
+ if (ThisPrec < PeekPrec ||
+ (ThisPrec == PeekPrec && isRightAssoc)) {
+ if (EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr(RHS, ThisPrec+1, PeekTok, RHSIsLive, PP))
+ return true;
+ PeekPrec = getPrecedence(PeekTok.getKind());
+ }
+ assert(PeekPrec <= ThisPrec && "Recursion didn't work!");
+
+ // Usual arithmetic conversions (C99 6.3.1.8p1): result is unsigned if
+ // either operand is unsigned. Don't do this for x and y in "x ? y : z".
+ llvm::APSInt Res(LHS.getBitWidth());
+ if (Operator != tok::question) {
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(LHS.isUnsigned()|RHS.isUnsigned());
+ // If this just promoted something from signed to unsigned, and if the
+ // value was negative, warn about it.
+ if (ValueLive && Res.isUnsigned()) {
+ if (!LHS.isUnsigned() && LHS.isNegative())
+ PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::warn_pp_convert_lhs_to_positive,
+ LHS.toStringSigned() + " to " + LHS.toStringUnsigned());
+ if (!RHS.isUnsigned() && RHS.isNegative())
+ PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::warn_pp_convert_rhs_to_positive,
+ RHS.toStringSigned() + " to " + RHS.toStringUnsigned());
+ }
+ LHS.setIsUnsigned(Res.isUnsigned());
+ RHS.setIsUnsigned(Res.isUnsigned());
+ }
+
+ // FIXME: All of these should detect and report overflow??
+ bool Overflow = false;
+ switch (Operator) {
+ default: assert(0 && "Unknown operator token!");
+ case tok::percent:
+ if (RHS == 0) {
+ if (ValueLive) PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::err_pp_remainder_by_zero);
+ return true;
+ }
+ Res = LHS % RHS;
+ break;
+ case tok::slash:
+ if (RHS == 0) {
+ if (ValueLive) PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::err_pp_division_by_zero);
+ return true;
+ }
+ Res = LHS / RHS;
+ if (LHS.isSigned())
+ Overflow = LHS.isMinSignedValue() && RHS.isAllOnesValue(); // MININT/-1
+ break;
+ case tok::star:
+ Res = LHS * RHS;
+ if (LHS != 0 && RHS != 0)
+ Overflow = Res/RHS != LHS || Res/LHS != RHS;
+ break;
+ case tok::lessless: {
+ // Determine whether overflow is about to happen.
+ unsigned ShAmt = static_cast<unsigned>(RHS.getLimitedValue());
+ if (ShAmt >= LHS.getBitWidth())
+ Overflow = true, ShAmt = LHS.getBitWidth()-1;
+ else if (LHS.isUnsigned())
+ Overflow = ShAmt > LHS.countLeadingZeros();
+ else if (LHS.isNonNegative())
+ Overflow = ShAmt >= LHS.countLeadingZeros(); // Don't allow sign change.
+ else
+ Overflow = ShAmt >= LHS.countLeadingOnes();
+
+ Res = LHS << ShAmt;
+ break;
+ }
+ case tok::greatergreater: {
+ // Determine whether overflow is about to happen.
+ unsigned ShAmt = static_cast<unsigned>(RHS.getLimitedValue());
+ if (ShAmt >= LHS.getBitWidth())
+ Overflow = true, ShAmt = LHS.getBitWidth()-1;
+ Res = LHS >> ShAmt;
+ break;
+ }
+ case tok::plus:
+ Res = LHS + RHS;
+ if (LHS.isUnsigned())
+ Overflow = Res.ult(LHS);
+ else if (LHS.isNonNegative() == RHS.isNonNegative() &&
+ Res.isNonNegative() != LHS.isNonNegative())
+ Overflow = true; // Overflow for signed addition.
+ break;
+ case tok::minus:
+ Res = LHS - RHS;
+ if (LHS.isUnsigned())
+ Overflow = Res.ugt(LHS);
+ else if (LHS.isNonNegative() != RHS.isNonNegative() &&
+ Res.isNonNegative() != LHS.isNonNegative())
+ Overflow = true; // Overflow for signed subtraction.
+ break;
+ case tok::lessequal:
+ Res = LHS <= RHS;
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.8p6, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::less:
+ Res = LHS < RHS;
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.8p6, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::greaterequal:
+ Res = LHS >= RHS;
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.8p6, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::greater:
+ Res = LHS > RHS;
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.8p6, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::exclaimequal:
+ Res = LHS != RHS;
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.9p3, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::equalequal:
+ Res = LHS == RHS;
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.9p3, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::amp:
+ Res = LHS & RHS;
+ break;
+ case tok::caret:
+ Res = LHS ^ RHS;
+ break;
+ case tok::pipe:
+ Res = LHS | RHS;
+ break;
+ case tok::ampamp:
+ Res = (LHS != 0 && RHS != 0);
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.13p3, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::pipepipe:
+ Res = (LHS != 0 || RHS != 0);
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(false); // C99 6.5.14p3, result is always int (signed)
+ break;
+ case tok::comma:
+ PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::ext_pp_comma_expr);
+ Res = RHS; // LHS = LHS,RHS -> RHS.
+ break;
+ case tok::question: {
+ // Parse the : part of the expression.
+ if (PeekTok.isNot(tok::colon)) {
+ PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::err_pp_question_without_colon);
+ return true;
+ }
+ // Consume the :.
+ PP.LexNonComment(PeekTok);
+
+ // Evaluate the value after the :.
+ bool AfterColonLive = ValueLive && LHS == 0;
+ llvm::APSInt AfterColonVal(LHS.getBitWidth());
+ DefinedTracker DT;
+ if (EvaluateValue(AfterColonVal, PeekTok, DT, AfterColonLive, PP))
+ return true;
+
+ // Parse anything after the : RHS that has a higher precedence than ?.
+ if (EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr(AfterColonVal, ThisPrec+1,
+ PeekTok, AfterColonLive, PP))
+ return true;
+
+ // Now that we have the condition, the LHS and the RHS of the :, evaluate.
+ Res = LHS != 0 ? RHS : AfterColonVal;
+
+ // Usual arithmetic conversions (C99 6.3.1.8p1): result is unsigned if
+ // either operand is unsigned.
+ Res.setIsUnsigned(RHS.isUnsigned() | AfterColonVal.isUnsigned());
+
+ // Figure out the precedence of the token after the : part.
+ PeekPrec = getPrecedence(PeekTok.getKind());
+ break;
+ }
+ case tok::colon:
+ // Don't allow :'s to float around without being part of ?: exprs.
+ PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::err_pp_colon_without_question);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ // If this operator is live and overflowed, report the issue.
+ if (Overflow && ValueLive)
+ PP.Diag(OpToken, diag::warn_pp_expr_overflow);
+
+ // Put the result back into 'LHS' for our next iteration.
+ LHS = Res;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// EvaluateDirectiveExpression - Evaluate an integer constant expression that
+/// may occur after a #if or #elif directive. If the expression is equivalent
+/// to "!defined(X)" return X in IfNDefMacro.
+bool Preprocessor::
+EvaluateDirectiveExpression(IdentifierInfo *&IfNDefMacro) {
+ // Peek ahead one token.
+ Token Tok;
+ Lex(Tok);
+
+ // C99 6.10.1p3 - All expressions are evaluated as intmax_t or uintmax_t.
+ unsigned BitWidth = getTargetInfo().getIntMaxTWidth();
+
+ llvm::APSInt ResVal(BitWidth);
+ DefinedTracker DT;
+ if (EvaluateValue(ResVal, Tok, DT, true, *this)) {
+ // Parse error, skip the rest of the macro line.
+ if (Tok.isNot(tok::eom))
+ DiscardUntilEndOfDirective();
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // If we are at the end of the expression after just parsing a value, there
+ // must be no (unparenthesized) binary operators involved, so we can exit
+ // directly.
+ if (Tok.is(tok::eom)) {
+ // If the expression we parsed was of the form !defined(macro), return the
+ // macro in IfNDefMacro.
+ if (DT.State == DefinedTracker::NotDefinedMacro)
+ IfNDefMacro = DT.TheMacro;
+
+ return ResVal != 0;
+ }
+
+ // Otherwise, we must have a binary operator (e.g. "#if 1 < 2"), so parse the
+ // operator and the stuff after it.
+ if (EvaluateDirectiveSubExpr(ResVal, 1, Tok, true, *this)) {
+ // Parse error, skip the rest of the macro line.
+ if (Tok.isNot(tok::eom))
+ DiscardUntilEndOfDirective();
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // If we aren't at the tok::eom token, something bad happened, like an extra
+ // ')' token.
+ if (Tok.isNot(tok::eom)) {
+ Diag(Tok, diag::err_pp_expected_eol);
+ DiscardUntilEndOfDirective();
+ }
+
+ return ResVal != 0;
+}
+