aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2011-01-25 22:19:32 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2011-01-25 22:19:32 +0000
commitb7cd135215501a154eb4f68159f3af020783099e (patch)
treecd4aeb8fee036232da018d785d8f35988754b416
parent2bc212120692987b02ae8a85366a58f1c36cc2bf (diff)
Speculatively implement a tweak to the C++0x overload resolution rules
for reference binding (C++ [over.rank.ics]p3b1sb4), so that we prefer the binding of an lvalue reference to a function lvalue over the binding of an rvalue reference. This change resolves the ambiguity with std::forward and lvalue references to function types in a way that seems consistent with the original rvalue references proposal. My proposed wording for this change is shown in isBetterReferenceBindingKind(); we'll try to get this change adopted in the C++0x working paper as well. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@124236 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--include/clang/Sema/Overload.h22
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp71
-rw-r--r--test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.best/over.ics.rank/p3-0x.cpp6
3 files changed, 70 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h b/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
index fa3c94b0ac..4a7cb20e61 100644
--- a/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
+++ b/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
@@ -133,24 +133,30 @@ namespace clang {
/// Deprecated - Whether this the deprecated conversion of a
/// string literal to a pointer to non-const character data
/// (C++ 4.2p2).
- bool DeprecatedStringLiteralToCharPtr : 1;
+ unsigned DeprecatedStringLiteralToCharPtr : 1;
/// IncompatibleObjC - Whether this is an Objective-C conversion
/// that we should warn about (if we actually use it).
- bool IncompatibleObjC : 1;
+ unsigned IncompatibleObjC : 1;
/// ReferenceBinding - True when this is a reference binding
/// (C++ [over.ics.ref]).
- bool ReferenceBinding : 1;
+ unsigned ReferenceBinding : 1;
/// DirectBinding - True when this is a reference binding that is a
/// direct binding (C++ [dcl.init.ref]).
- bool DirectBinding : 1;
-
- /// RRefBinding - True when this is a reference binding of an rvalue
- /// reference to an rvalue (C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3b4).
- bool RRefBinding : 1;
+ unsigned DirectBinding : 1;
+ /// \brief Whether this is an lvalue reference binding (otherwise, it's
+ /// an rvalue reference binding).
+ unsigned IsLvalueReference : 1;
+
+ /// \brief Whether we're binding to a function lvalue.
+ unsigned BindsToFunctionLvalue : 1;
+
+ /// \brief Whether we're binding to an rvalue.
+ unsigned BindsToRvalue : 1;
+
/// FromType - The type that this conversion is converting
/// from. This is an opaque pointer that can be translated into a
/// QualType.
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 85ae6f7326..602a118c3b 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -170,7 +170,9 @@ void StandardConversionSequence::setAsIdentityConversion() {
DeprecatedStringLiteralToCharPtr = false;
ReferenceBinding = false;
DirectBinding = false;
- RRefBinding = false;
+ IsLvalueReference = true;
+ BindsToFunctionLvalue = false;
+ BindsToRvalue = false;
CopyConstructor = 0;
}
@@ -2324,6 +2326,33 @@ compareStandardConversionSubsets(ASTContext &Context,
return ImplicitConversionSequence::Indistinguishable;
}
+/// \brief Determine whether one of the given reference bindings is better
+/// than the other based on what kind of bindings they are.
+static bool isBetterReferenceBindingKind(const StandardConversionSequence &SCS1,
+ const StandardConversionSequence &SCS2) {
+ // C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3b4:
+ // -- S1 and S2 are reference bindings (8.5.3) and neither refers to an
+ // implicit object parameter of a non-static member function declared
+ // without a ref-qualifier, and *either* S1 binds an rvalue reference
+ // to an rvalue and S2 binds an lvalue reference *or S1 binds an
+ // lvalue reference to a function lvalue and S2 binds an rvalue
+ // reference*.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Rvalue references. We're going rogue with the above edits,
+ // because the semantics in the current C++0x working paper (N3225 at the
+ // time of this writing) break the standard definition of std::forward
+ // and std::reference_wrapper when dealing with references to functions.
+ // Proposed wording changes submitted to CWG for consideration.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Rvalue references. We don't know if we're dealing with the
+ // implicit object parameter, or if the member function in this case has a
+ // ref qualifier. (Of course, we don't have ref qualifiers yet.)
+ return (!SCS1.IsLvalueReference && SCS1.BindsToRvalue &&
+ SCS2.IsLvalueReference) ||
+ (SCS1.IsLvalueReference && SCS1.BindsToFunctionLvalue &&
+ !SCS2.IsLvalueReference);
+}
+
/// CompareStandardConversionSequences - Compare two standard
/// conversion sequences to determine whether one is better than the
/// other or if they are indistinguishable (C++ 13.3.3.2p3).
@@ -2429,18 +2458,12 @@ CompareStandardConversionSequences(Sema &S,
return QualCK;
if (SCS1.ReferenceBinding && SCS2.ReferenceBinding) {
- // C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3b4:
- // -- S1 and S2 are reference bindings (8.5.3) and neither refers to an
- // implicit object parameter of a non-static member function declared
- // without a ref-qualifier, and S1 binds an rvalue reference to an
- // rvalue and S2 binds an lvalue reference.
- // FIXME: Rvalue references. We don't know if we're dealing with the
- // implicit object parameter, or if the member function in this case has a
- // ref qualifier. (Of course, we don't have ref qualifiers yet.)
- if (SCS1.RRefBinding != SCS2.RRefBinding)
- return SCS1.RRefBinding ? ImplicitConversionSequence::Better
- : ImplicitConversionSequence::Worse;
-
+ // Check for a better reference binding based on the kind of bindings.
+ if (isBetterReferenceBindingKind(SCS1, SCS2))
+ return ImplicitConversionSequence::Better;
+ else if (isBetterReferenceBindingKind(SCS2, SCS1))
+ return ImplicitConversionSequence::Worse;
+
// C++ [over.ics.rank]p3b4:
// -- S1 and S2 are reference bindings (8.5.3), and the types to
// which the references refer are the same type except for
@@ -2966,7 +2989,9 @@ TryReferenceInit(Sema &S, Expr *&Init, QualType DeclType,
ICS.Standard.setToType(2, T1);
ICS.Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
ICS.Standard.DirectBinding = true;
- ICS.Standard.RRefBinding = isRValRef && InitCategory.isRValue();
+ ICS.Standard.IsLvalueReference = !isRValRef;
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToFunctionLvalue = T2->isFunctionType();
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToRvalue = false;
ICS.Standard.CopyConstructor = 0;
// Nothing more to do: the inaccessibility/ambiguity check for
@@ -3036,7 +3061,9 @@ TryReferenceInit(Sema &S, Expr *&Init, QualType DeclType,
ICS.Standard.DirectBinding =
S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x ||
(InitCategory.isPRValue() && !T2->isRecordType());
- ICS.Standard.RRefBinding = isRValRef && InitCategory.isRValue();
+ ICS.Standard.IsLvalueReference = !isRValRef;
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToFunctionLvalue = T2->isFunctionType();
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToRvalue = InitCategory.isRValue();
ICS.Standard.CopyConstructor = 0;
return ICS;
}
@@ -3114,10 +3141,14 @@ TryReferenceInit(Sema &S, Expr *&Init, QualType DeclType,
// Of course, that's still a reference binding.
if (ICS.isStandard()) {
ICS.Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
- ICS.Standard.RRefBinding = isRValRef;
+ ICS.Standard.IsLvalueReference = !isRValRef;
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToFunctionLvalue = T2->isFunctionType();
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToRvalue = true;
} else if (ICS.isUserDefined()) {
ICS.UserDefined.After.ReferenceBinding = true;
- ICS.UserDefined.After.RRefBinding = isRValRef;
+ ICS.Standard.IsLvalueReference = !isRValRef;
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToFunctionLvalue = T2->isFunctionType();
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToRvalue = true;
}
return ICS;
@@ -3212,7 +3243,11 @@ TryObjectArgumentInitialization(Sema &S, QualType OrigFromType,
ICS.Standard.setAllToTypes(ImplicitParamType);
ICS.Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
ICS.Standard.DirectBinding = true;
- ICS.Standard.RRefBinding = false;
+
+ // FIXME: Rvalue references.
+ ICS.Standard.IsLvalueReference = true;
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToFunctionLvalue = false;
+ ICS.Standard.BindsToRvalue = false;
return ICS;
}
diff --git a/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.best/over.ics.rank/p3-0x.cpp b/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.best/over.ics.rank/p3-0x.cpp
index faff058a50..ab171bc3f6 100644
--- a/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.best/over.ics.rank/p3-0x.cpp
+++ b/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.best/over.ics.rank/p3-0x.cpp
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ struct remove_reference<T&&> {
};
namespace FunctionReferencesOverloading {
- template<typename T> int &f(typename remove_reference<T>::type&); // expected-note{{candidate function [with T = int (&)(int)]}}
- template<typename T> float &f(typename remove_reference<T>::type&&); // expected-note{{candidate function [with T = int (&)(int)]}}
+ template<typename T> int &f(typename remove_reference<T>::type&);
+ template<typename T> float &f(typename remove_reference<T>::type&&);
void test_f(int (&func_ref)(int)) {
- f<int (&)(int)>(func_ref); // expected-error{{call to 'f' is ambiguous}}
+ int &ir = f<int (&)(int)>(func_ref);
}
}