diff options
author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-02-16 22:38:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-02-16 22:38:20 +0000 |
commit | 4310f4ee260e6c7ceeaf299e240f4d789ecc730d (patch) | |
tree | 49e8c2988019918eb20665209c97b61e98f2dedf | |
parent | d603eaa682cecac2c10771a700cb83aa301653b4 (diff) |
Make "implicit int" an error in C++ (unless we're allowing Microsoft
extensions). This caught a couple bugs in our test suite :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r-- | include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.def | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | test/Parser/cxx-template-decl.cpp | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | test/SemaCXX/implicit-int.cpp | 5 |
4 files changed, 23 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.def b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.def index cdb7f62d72..af4c7f5aa4 100644 --- a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.def +++ b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.def @@ -1375,6 +1375,8 @@ DIAG(ext_missing_declspec, EXTENSION, "declaration specifier missing, defaulting to 'int'") DIAG(ext_missing_type_specifier, EXTENSION, "type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'") +DIAG(err_missing_type_specifier, ERROR, + "C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations") DIAG(warn_objc_array_of_interfaces, WARNING, "array of interface %0 should probably be an array of pointers") DIAG(ext_c99_array_usage, EXTENSION, diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp index 021e18e5d7..9a575ced9e 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp @@ -79,14 +79,16 @@ QualType Sema::ConvertDeclSpecToType(const DeclSpec &DS) { DeclSpec::PQ_TypeSpecifier | DeclSpec::PQ_TypeQualifier)) == 0) Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::ext_missing_declspec); - } else { + } else if (!DS.hasTypeSpecifier()) { // C99 and C++ require a type specifier. For example, C99 6.7.2p2 says: // "At least one type specifier shall be given in the declaration // specifiers in each declaration, and in the specifier-qualifier list in // each struct declaration and type name." - // FIXME: this should be a hard error in C++ - if (!DS.hasTypeSpecifier()) - Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::ext_missing_type_specifier); + // FIXME: Does Microsoft really have the implicit int extension in C++? + unsigned DK = getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && !getLangOptions().Microsoft? + diag::err_missing_type_specifier + : diag::ext_missing_type_specifier; + Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), DK); } // FALL THROUGH. diff --git a/test/Parser/cxx-template-decl.cpp b/test/Parser/cxx-template-decl.cpp index 54d1081b42..ce617fb7a2 100644 --- a/test/Parser/cxx-template-decl.cpp +++ b/test/Parser/cxx-template-decl.cpp @@ -2,9 +2,11 @@ // Errors export class foo { }; // expected-error {{expected template}} -template x; // expected-error {{expected '<' after 'template'}} +template x; // expected-error {{expected '<' after 'template'}} \ +// expected-error {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}} export template x; // expected-error {{expected '<' after 'template'}} \ - // expected-note {{exported templates are unsupported}} + // expected-note {{exported templates are unsupported}} \ +// expected-error {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}} // See Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec about the double diagnostic. This is // because ParseNonTypeTemplateParameter starts parsing a DeclSpec. template < ; // expected-error {{parse error}} expected-error {{declaration does not declare anything}} @@ -26,8 +28,8 @@ template <typename> struct C; template <typename, typename> struct D; // Forward declarations with default parameters? -template <typename T = int> X1; -template <typename = int> X2; +template <typename T = int> class X1; +template <typename = int> class X2; // Forward declarations w/template template parameters template <template <typename> class T> class TTP1; @@ -41,10 +43,10 @@ template <int> class NTP0; template <int N> class NTP1; template <int N = 5> class NTP2; template <int = 10> class NTP3; -template <unsigned int N = 12u> NTP4;; -template <unsigned int = 12u> NTP5; -template <unsigned = 15u> NTP6; -template <typename T, T Obj> NTP7; +template <unsigned int N = 12u> class NTP4; +template <unsigned int = 12u> class NTP5; +template <unsigned = 15u> class NTP6; +template <typename T, T Obj> class NTP7; // Template class declarations template <typename T> struct A { }; diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/implicit-int.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/implicit-int.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f771810e6f --- /dev/null +++ b/test/SemaCXX/implicit-int.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -verify %s + +x; // expected-error{{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}} + +f(int y) { return y; } // expected-error{{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}} |